unirule-logo
Independent Think Tank - China Market Reform Initiative

Home
Unirule Highlights
About Us
People
Research
Consulting
Biweekly Symposium
Events
Publication
News
Newsletters
Videos
Support Us
Contact Us
中文


You are here:Home>Biweekly Symposium



[Biweekly Symposium] No. 477: Vertical Limit of the System and the Transition to Democracy
 
 Author:Unirule  
Time:2013-10-21 14:13:56   Clicks:


[Biweekly Symposium] No. 477: Vertical Limit of the System and the Transition to Democracy

Time: May 24th, 2013

Topic: Vertical Limit of the System and the Transition to Democracy

Lecturer: CAO Zhenghan

Commentators: TONG Zhihui, LIU Haibo, SUN Long, WANG Qinghua

 

In the symposium, Professor CAO Zhenghan introduced the constitutional rules. He believed that the Chinese constitutionalism means the two-level legitimacy of the public power, and the restraining and limitation of the public power. He also put forward the idea that institutional transformation is the self-betterment and self-development of constitutional rules. He supported his argumentation with four examples where experiments of democratic reforms are taking places on the local level.

Dr. TONG Zhihui believed that the congress’ supervision over the government can be considered as the horizontal division of powers. Local congresses of the people oversee and limit the execution powers. He disagreed with the statement that the party’s control over the congress, and the congress’ supervision over the government can be taken as vertical limit to the public power.

Dr. LIU Haibo thought more research should be done on the reasons why experiments of local democratic reforms were shut down. It did not make sense to have pilot of such practices on the township level, rather than the national level. More efforts should be taken in political reforms. And the executive system should be greatly improved.

Dr. SUN Long thought the concept of two-level legitimacy needed reconsideration. Democracy on the local level is more than often distorted and abused. The current innovation to democracy does not hold constitutional significance. And the top-down political reform was flawed.

Dr. WANg Qinghua thought direct election could hardly be considered as innovation with constitutional significance. Democracy needed institutional support, which resulted in the direct link to the congressional mechanism reforms that promoted direct election of congress representatives on the national level. Local autonomy couldn’t come true without thorough political reforms.

Professor ZHANG Shuguang recognized the methodology taken by Professor CAO. He thought the concept of two-level legitimacy could be improved. Political tools could be abused, which may result distortion of the system in practice. More research should be done on the power distribution and control by the central government. And he held that not like economic reforms, political reforms should take a top-down mode, and should not be experimented.

 

 

 




Upcoming Events
Unirule and Fairbank Cent...  
A Seminar on “Tax Burden...  
An Urbanization Salon Hel...  
The Sixth Session of the ...  
Seminar on “Theoretical ...  
The Sixth Session of West...  
The Third Session of Haye...  
The New Economy Salon Ses...  
unirule
        Unirule Institute of Economics
        Floor 6, Zhengren Building, No. 9, Chong Wen Men Wai Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100062, China
        Tel: 8610-52988127 Fax: 8610-52988127